Algorithmic Sovereignty and the Reconfiguration of International Power: The U.S.-China Rivalry as a Structural Model

المؤلفون

  • Asst. Prof. Dr. Basil Muhsin Muhanna University of Kufa, College of Political Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61353/ma.0240472

الكلمات المفتاحية:

Algorithmic Sovereignty، Structural Realism، Digital Geopolitics، Weaponized Interdependence، U.S.-China Technological Rivalry

الملخص

Algorithmic sovereignty is furthered through this study to demonstrate the structural change of power in the modern international system. It states that twenty-first century sovereignty is becoming more and more embedded within computational infrastructures, artificial intelligence systems, semiconductor supply chains, and transnational data architectures as opposed to territorial mastery or military power. Succeeding structural realism, the article analytically extends the concept of structural realism with the Algorithmic Structural Realism, which asserts that the dispensation of algorithmic capabilities has emerged as a key determinant of systemic hierarchy.

The study presents the U.S.-China technological rivalry as a systematic comparative case to study and analyze the competition in three interconnected business areas: advanced semiconductors, cloud computing and digital infrastructures, and telecommunications standards. It shows that these industries are strategic value chains whose management defines structural positions in the global digital order. Mechanisms of algorithmic deterrence are discussed as export controls, technological sanctions, and supply chain weaponization. The article creates three variable-based future scenarios of digital unipolarity, technological bipolarity, and distributed digital multipolarity that are founded upon the changes in semiconductor dominance, AI innovation dominance, standards regulation, and alliance formation trends.

It concludes that the polarity in the new order is shifting to a hybrid techno-structural form where the ability to interfere or even take over digital infrastructures becomes a fundamental mechanism of power balancing and systemic influence.

المراجع

1. Allen, Gregory C. (2019). Understanding China's AI strategy: Clues to Chinese strategic thinking on artificial intelligence and national security. Center for a New American Security.

2. Allison, Graham, et al. (2021). The great tech rivalry: China vs. the U.S. Belfer Center Report, Harvard Kennedy School.

3. Brodie, Bernard. (1946). The absolute weapon: Atomic power and world order. Harcourt, Brace.

4. Castells, Manuel. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

5. Castells, Manuel. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Polity Press.

6. DeNardis, Laura. (2014). The global war for internet governance. Yale University Press.

7. European Commission. (2020). Shaping Europe's digital future. European Union.

8. Farrell, Henry, & Newman, Abraham L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42-79.

9. Fiott, Daniel. (2021). Algorithmic sovereignty and the EU's digital autonomy. EUISS Brief, European Union Institute for Security Studies.

10. Freedman, Lawrence. (2003). Deterrence. Polity Press.

11. Gilpin, Robert. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press.

12. Horowitz, Michael C. (2018). The diffusion of military power: Causes and consequences for international politics. Princeton University Press.

13. Kania, Elsa B. (2017). Artificial intelligence and Chinese military power. Center for a New American Security.

14. Kennedy, Paul. (1987). The rise and fall of the great powers. Random House.

15. Krasner, Stephen D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.

16. Lee, Kai-Fu. (2018). AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

17. Mearsheimer, John J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton.

18. Miller, Chris. (2022). Chip war: The fight for the world's most critical technology. Scribner.

19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Data governance in the digital age. OECD Publishing.

20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). OECD AI policy observatory report 2023. OECD.

21. Osiander, Andreas. (2001). Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth. International Organization, 55(2), 251-287.

22. Rid, Thomas. (2013). Cyber war will not take place. Hurst.

23. Schelling, Thomas C. (1966). Arms and influence. Yale University Press.

24. Segal, Adam. (2018). The hacked world order: How nations fight, trade, maneuver, and manipulate in the digital age. Public Affairs.

25. Shane, Scott. (2022). OpenAI, Google, Microsoft: AI leadership and cloud-scale development. TechCrunch.

26. Stanford University. (2023). AI index report 2023. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.

27. State Council of the People's Republic of China. (2017). New generation artificial intelligence development plan. State Council.

28. Statista. (2023). Cloud market share 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/cloud-market-share-2023

29. Synergy Research Group. (2023). Cloud market share report 2023. Synergy Research Group.

30. Tilly, Charles. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1990. Blackwell.

31. TOP500. (2023). TOP500 list – November 2023. https://www.top500.org/list/2023/11/

32. United States Congress. (2022). CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 (Public Law No. 117-167). https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ167/PLAW-117publ167.pdf

33. United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security. (2022, October 7). Commerce Department imposes new export controls on advanced computing and semiconductor manufacturing items to China.

34. United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security. (2023, October 12). Commerce expands export controls on advanced computing items to China.

35. United States Department of Defense. (2018). Summary of the 2018 national defense strategy of the United States of America. Department of Defense.

36. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.

37. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1981). The spread of nuclear weapons: More may be better. Adelphi Paper No. 171, IISS.

38. Weber, Max. (1946). Politics as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 77-128). Oxford University Press.

39. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2019). WIPO technology trends 2019: Artificial intelligence. WIPO.

40. Zuboff, Shoshana. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. Public Affairs.

التنزيلات

منشور

02-09-2026

كيفية الاقتباس

Algorithmic Sovereignty and the Reconfiguration of International Power: The U.S.-China Rivalry as a Structural Model. (2026). Al-MAHAD Journal, 24, 472-507. https://doi.org/10.61353/ma.0240472

المؤلفات المشابهة

11-20 من 73

يمكنك أيضاً إبدأ بحثاً متقدماً عن المشابهات لهذا المؤلَّف.