أحكام قرينة صحة القرارات الإدارية - دراسة مقارنة

Authors

  • أ.د صعب ناجي عبود معهد العلمين للدراسات العليا
  • الباحثة/ يسرى شاكر حنتوش معهد العلمين للدراسات العليا

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61353/ma.0170001

Keywords:

administrative decisions, presumption of validity of decisions

Abstract

The regular and steady operation of public facilities and the daily life of citizens is a necessity that requires the individual to submit to the administrative decision, even if they have doubts about its legality and until the administrative decision is ruled to be cancelled. The goal of this is not to cause disruption or delay to daily life in addition to the resulting harm to the public interest, which It prevails when it conflicts with private interest, and the presumption of the validity of administrative decisions has a basis that came from it and was born with the decision and became inherent to it throughout its existence. This presumption is based on several foundations, both theoretical and practical, and includes the effective practice of administrative work in addition to the due legal insurance for the prevailing administrative and legal position, in addition. This presumption requires the existence of certain conditions, and the administration is obligated to adhere to these conditions in order to maintain legitimacy, and therefore its decision will not be challenged    by the judiciary or individuals

Published

29-08-2024

How to Cite

أ.د صعب ناجي عبود, & الباحثة/ يسرى شاكر حنتوش. (2024). أحكام قرينة صحة القرارات الإدارية - دراسة مقارنة. Al-MAHAD Journal, (17), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.61353/ma.0170001