إجراءات الدعوى الإدارية أمام المحاكم الإدارية - دراسة مقارنة

Abstract

 The research dealt with the extent of the discrepancy between the procedures followed and regulated by legal texts to accept the cancellation claim in some countries that differ in some of their names and procedures, although the discrepancy is relative, and the Jordanian and Tunisian position was adopted as a comparative study.

These procedures were developed for a lawsuit against the administrative decision, and thus were developed to regulate the work of the litigation process in the court, and to relieve the complainant.

Where the research dealt with the procedures governing the appeal from the process of writing the petition until the acceptance of the case in form.

Where it was clearly shown the clear difference between some of the procedures followed between the courts, the most important of which is the appointment of a lawyer, and the payment of judicial fees, The Jordanian legislator showed a kind of stagnation and strictness as a formality of acceptance. On the other hand, the Tunisian legislator and administrative judge showed a kind of flexibility as he exempted the appellant from his attorney, as well as the possibility of requesting judicial aid exemption from fees, In addition to the difference and immaterial difference in terms of the nature and conditions of the summons the petition.