معايير اختصاص القضاء الجزائي (دراسة مقارنة)

Authors

  • أ.د جورج الياس الأحمر كلية الحقوق – الجامعة اللبنانية / لبنان
  • الباحثة/ زينب جبار عبيد الجاسمي كلية القانون – الجامعة الإسلامية / لبنان

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61353/ma.0170339

Keywords:

crime, offender, punishment, investigative authorities, criminal justice

Abstract

When the crime occurs in a society, this requires following up the perpetrator, holding him accountable and inflicting punishment on him, and for this, the legislator organized the procedures of the investigative and judicial authorities, Haliem Niema Hussein  and gave each of them its competence to practice its work tasks within the scope of its drawing for it in advance.The legislator has determined the types of jurisdiction according to the internal criteria, which include the personal jurisdiction represented by the person of the offender and the qualitative jurisdiction related to the quality of the court that exercises jurisdiction and the spatial jurisdiction that means the location or place where the crime was committed. The legislator has determined the types of jurisdiction according to the internal criteria, which include the personal jurisdiction represented by the person of the offender and the qualitative jurisdiction related to the quality of the court that exercises jurisdiction and the spatial jurisdiction that means the location or place where the crime was committed. the place of their commission on the territory of another country and the perpetrator was not among its nationals, even if it did not touch its sovereignty or security, but it is sufficient that they are crimes of general danger to society as a whole.

Published

29-08-2024

How to Cite

أ.د جورج الياس الأحمر, & الباحثة/ زينب جبار عبيد الجاسمي. (2024). معايير اختصاص القضاء الجزائي (دراسة مقارنة). Al-MAHAD Journal, (17), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.61353/ma.0170339